Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 6 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
of the zoning ordinance amendment.”
The suit claims that in adopting the amendment banning sludge, the Board of Supervisors violated its own zoning ordinance and Comprehensive Plan, state laws guaranteeing the “right to farm” and establishing agricultural and forestal districts, and the complainants’ rights to due process under the U.S. Constitution.
The suit claims the amendment is “arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, discriminatory, and confiscatory and fails to advance any legitimate public purpose, or the public health, safety and walfare and thereby violates complainants rights to due process.” The suit claims that the complainants have no other recourse within the law.
95.3%