Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 11 · column 1 of 10 · from the scan, no model involved
80
Legal Notice*
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY
HENRY WARNER REAGER and ADDISON TURNER REAGER,
Complainants
v.
MARGARET R. TANNER P.O. Box 3681 Norfolk, Virginia 23514
BETTY LOU LAKE 227 Church Street, Apt. 3 Front Royal, Virginia 22630
LUCY MAE HALE 2507 Blue Quail San Antonio, Texas 78232
and j
UNKNOWN HEIRS of Mary J. Reager, Ora M. Reager, C.C. Reager, Charles C. Reager, Henry Wilhoit Reager and Charles Thomas Reager, or their widow or widower ad heirs, devisees and successors in title, whose names and addressed are unknown and who are made parties defendant by the general description of Parties unknown,
AND any other unknown heir, devisees and successors in title,' if any such there be, and/or any unknown parties having an interst in the lands of which Mary J. Reager, Ora M. Reager, C.C. Reager, Charles C. Reager, Henry Wilhoit Reager and Charles Thomas Reager died seized and possessed, whose names and addresses are unknown and who are made parties defendant by the general description PARTIES UNKNOWN.
Defendants
IN CHANCERY NO.
95CH-40
The object of this suit is to effect partition amongst the owners by sale or otherwise, of tracts of. land of which Mary J. Reager, Ora M. Reager, C.C. Reager (a/k/a/ Charles C. Reager), Henry Wilhoit Reager and Charles Thomas Reager died seized and possessed, located in Wakefield magisterial District, Rappahannock County. Virginia, and containing 1.02 acres and 1.90. acres, respectively, more or less, as is more fully recited in said Bill of Complaint.
An Affidavit having been made and filed and the Bill of Complaint having stated that the said Lucy Mae Hale is a non-resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that there are or may be persons interested in the subject matter of this suit whose whereabouts cannot be determined or whose names and/or addresses are unknown, which Bill of Complaint has made said persons parties defendant by the general description PARTIES UNKNOWN, and that some or all of said persons may suffer from a legal incapacity, it is, therefore
79.1%