Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 5 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
legitimate bearing on Carter’s decision to leave Rappahannock.
“A contract is a contract,” answered Miller, describing Carter’s resignation as “not totally ethical.”
Then a person who walks out on an elected term of office is not totally ethical either, countered Mrs. Scherschel, in apparent reference to Miller’s past resignation as county supervisor.
Several persons in the audience, Miller along with them, laughed at her retort. The argument was dropped and the charged atmosphere defused.
John Summers said that he felt political views had something to do with Carter’s resignation, based on his personal conversation with the man.
Bloomer disagreed with the assertion and maintained, without going into specifics, that a recent account in the Rappahannock News of a discussion involving Carter and School Board members on political beliefs had been “misunderstood” and “taken out of context.” Bloomer maintained that School Board members were not concerned with political beliefs but rather with style of life that would allqw an applicant for a position in the Rappahannock school system to be happy in the county.
Deficiency?
Sharon Kilpatrick asked if loss of an administrator at the elementary school would cause a deficiency to be charged against Rappahannock under the standards of quality.
Bloomer replied that he didn’t know the answer yet and would have to check into the matter.
“Would assistance from the Superintendent’s office help?” she continued.
It would as far as a deficiency being charged
96.3%