Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 6 · column 6 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
CHAPLIN BARNES
has also held that zoning laws constitute the taking of property when they do not substantially advance legitimate governmental interests or when they deny the owner any economically viable use of his land. In any legal controversy, the Court’s decision, as the Supreme Court noted here, involves the weighing of private and public interests.
Here the Court found that the zoning ordinances in question “...substantially advance legitimate governmental goals." Noting that the California legislature had determined that the development of local open space plans would discourage the “premature and unnecessary conversion of open space land to urban uses," it held that the local ordinances were appropriate exercises of
92.9%