Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 6 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
eivjptrx , uniugicu.
Specifically, the Kidwell Lot A is subject to the identical right of way set forth in the deed to Lot D, the first lot sold (to Charles Kalbfus), whereby the grantor, Lindgren, grants the right to use the fifty-foot right of way, which is then described and platted in detail. The deed states:
“Said right of way shall be for all means of travel, including but not limited to passage by foot, animal and vehicles...It is further understood and agreed to that said right of way shall be used in common with others now having or hereinafter granted a like right to use said roadway, it being expressly understood that said right of way is not an exclusive right of way for the tract of land conveyed.” (Emphasis added.)
The same language appears in the deeds of all six lots bordering the right of way in the Lindgren-Whaley tract. The right of way is granted in every case by the developer, Oscar Lindgren, not by the Kid wells. The Kidwells’ obsession with what they deem to be some special privilege in the use of this right of way surfaced in public again at the October 12 Rappahannock BZA meeting, to which I applied for a permit to build duplexes for farm employees.
90.1%