Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 12 · column 2 of 11 · from the scan, no model involved
parauon oi an aspects oi a rehabilitation program's design. This study will then be used as the basis tor an application tor FY 1991 Virginia COBG funds. This study is not intended to be a complete housing rehabilitation job writeup. PROPOSAL EVALUATION All proposals will be evaluated on evidence of understanding of the work to be completed, the objectives to be achieved, and the capabilities of the proposed team. All respondents shall submit information pertaining to the following cnteria.
1 ) Past experience
with similar studies.
2. ) Qualifications and
availability of individuals
to be assigned to
study.
3. ) Time for completion
of study (start with authorization
to begin
through completion of
study and delivery of
report and recommendations.
Include a calendar
of events with
dates of completion).
4. ) Related experience
with CDBG Community
Improvement grant ap
plications.
All respondents must conform to the Federal Equal Employment Opportunity requirements and upon request supply documentation of compliance. Proposals shall be received no later than 4:30 p.m., Friday, February 9, 1990, at the Building, Zoning and Administration Office, Porter and Main Streets, Washington, VA, 22747 (or at P.O. Drawer 519), c/o Mr. John W. McCarthy, County Administrator. Late proposals shall not be considered.
Mr. McCarthy will respond to questions and schedule pre-bid meetings as needed: please reach him at (703) 675-3342. Proposals from qualified and responsible firms will be ranked by a Selection Committee on the above criteria, and interviews will be held by the Committee with the top two (2) ranking firms. The Committee will negotiate a fee with the firm that ranks the highest following the interviews. If a suitably agreeable fee cannot be finalized with the, highest ranking firm, negotiation will be held with the firm with the next highest ranking.
Proposals should be prepared simply and economically. providing a straight-forward, concise description of the firm’s ability to meet the requirements of the RFP Fancy bindings, colored displays, promotional material, etc., are not desired. Emphasis should be on clarity of content and completeness. Respondents are cautioned not to distribute proposals in any other fashion other than is prescribed in this RFP.
81.8%