Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Tower
From Page A1
mentary toward Sprint PCS’ efforts to improve their proposal on this second attempt.
Bayard Catron’s statement was at one end of the spectrum. Mr. Catron said that he opposed “the Sprint PCS application in toto” and that, “In the future, I will oppose any such application from a private company that proposes any industrial use of agricultural or conservation zone land in this county.” He went on to stress his objections to the right of a private corporation “to overturn legitimate . . . zoning ordinances . . .” without evidence that “overwhelming public interest is being served.”
Despite his opposition though, Mr. Catron pledged his support for any decision reached by the Planning Commission, because, “You are my neighbors. I know you and I trust that you will find the best course of action in this matter.”
Jim Gannon, representing the RLEP, presented a statement in support of the proposed monopoles but in strong opposition to the three proposed “stealth” silos. He said that “there is nothing “stealthy” about a 90 foot silo,” and he referred to the Virginia
97.2%