Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 18 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

i/j o ap^utaitun iui a willance be approved. He added that he Ranted to “take John off the hook. H[e is not responsible for my comments. Mr. Gooch made a very good point, and my comments were not personal against any member of the ARB. I was simply pointing out the consequences of a prolonged decision —r or the wrong decision." . Diane Bruce, speaking on behalf of the vestry committee of Trinity Episcopal Church, also urged that the application be approved. ; Mayor Morehouse, counseling restraint in public comments, urged everyone to remember that, "we are all basically volunteer boards. The ARB has a tough job, a highly visible job. They have done a good job of educating themselves on our ordirlance and working to strengthen it. I Former Mayor and Supervisor Newbill Miller, speaking later in the meeting, called for some clarification in the public mind about the intent of the ARB. Most controversy, he said, centers on the Historic District Ordinance.

But people “don't talk about the Historic District Ordinance, they talk about the Architectural Review Board. But they are only part of the Historic District Ordinance . . . (which) was passed to protect the character of the historic district. It Has improved the quality of life and the aesthetics of the town, and increased property values — and as a tfesult decreased the taxes paid by County residents.

“Somebody," Mr. Miller concluded, “has got to get the word out about what the town and the Historic District Ordinance is trying to do. it is time to get together and stop this foolishness.”

No boundary changes likely

Mayor Morehouse, reporting on discussions he and Mr. Fisher have had with the county about changes in the town boundary line, said that the consensus is that no alterations should be made. "It is our opinion that the town boundary does not constitute a lot boundary." There is no subdivision of existing lots created because a jurisdictional boundary divides the parcel, he said.

Mr. McCarthy and Mr. Massie said that the county would like to

72.3%