Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 6 · column 5 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Culpeper County. (I am not making this up.)
Then there are the usual bogey-men about “erosion of our basic freedoms and increased tax bills.” The ordinance erodes none of his freedoms, basic or otherwise, and has nothing to do with taxes. (How does telling a McDonald’s to shield its lights increase my tax bill? I don’t get it.)
Finally, Mr. Lindquist claims that “a new lighting ordinance is not wanted or needed by the majority of citizens." That’s wishful thinking; he has no data and doesn’t like
69.0%