Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 4 · column 1 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

By PETERS. HOLLEY

Rappahannock New* Contrlbwtinf Writer

William R. Hawkins’ article “A Tug-of-War over Control” (Rappahannock News, Feb. 19) is, first of all, full of non sequibun: his beads of fact and opinion are strung on strands of over-cooked spaghetti that fall apart at the merest touch.

But what is worse are the implications of his argument on the fiiture - the impact of his ideas on America’s prophetic destiny. To see the future, let’s look first at the past.

God drew a strong, clear line of demarcation between the bi-millennial age of Old Testament Judaism, and that of New Testament Christianity in 132 A.D. when the Roman Emperor Hadrian brought the theocratic nation of Israel to its final end and expelled all Jews from their homeland.

Hadrian fulfilled every prophecy in the Bible concerning the "Wicked One,” or “Antichrist,” the apostles believed was soon to come, except <me - namely, he was not killed by Jesus’ Second Coming. But he did die in a manner like King Herod, whom according to the Bible (Acts 12:23) an angel smote. Daniel 9:26 prophesied Hadrian by name, in that the Latin for the word “people” is “publicus” and the Emperor’s given name was “Publius,” which has an identical root.

It is indeed more than ironical that Jay and Hamilton, when they authored the Federalist Papers, signed themselves by the very same name as the Antichrist of the Judeo end-time, a man who is called by his biographer “a second Antiochus Epiphanes:” PUBLIUS! But as Mr. Hawkins points out, the presidency advocated by the Federalists (and himself) was similar to “the traditional function of monarchs,” and one might say, in a nation as powerfill as ours, “of emperors” ... of even Roman emperors.

Mr. Hawkins is a consultant to the U.S. Business and Industrial Council, and I hope that he advises them to put morality and conscience before bottom-line, because the state-like power presently wielded by giant, immoral corporations of business and industry is one of the greatest threats to representative, government that we have ever faced. And it is in exactly this context that Mr. Hawkins’ appeal for a stronger presidency and a weaker Congress ought to be viewed v be

84.9%