Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 5 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
meeting betweed the attorneys for the two bodies would help.
Luke suggested that the Supervisors show “good faith” by appropriating the additional $1,200 necessary for the BZA’s attorney’s fees. “You have your attorney give you a ruling,” he told Gardiner. “Then we’ll have a meeting.”
“I don’t see how you can have an amicable meeting unless one or the other side backs down," interjected Davis. He announced that it would violate his professional integrity to offer the Supervisors "dishonest legal advice” and so he would counsel the Board against reversing its decision to intervene in the suit. “Unless they (the BZA) are willing to change their position, 1 don’t see any fruitful result” coming from a joint meeting, Davis said.
If the Supervisors are unwilling to even try a joint meeting with the BZA, "then we would be more obstinate than I’d like to see us be,” Luke responded.
No Fruitful Results
Davis said that the judge may require that the counsels for both bodies meet but repeated that he could see "no fruitful results” in a joint session between the members of the BZA and the Board of Supervisors.
Wood suggested that no additional funds be appropriated for the BZA until after a meeting between Davis and Fitzgerald. Supervisor Dick Latham supported Wood's proposal.
"I think we should agree that if there can be no accommodation. we'll support them (the BZA) with an appropriation of $1,200,” Luke commented.
Wood repeated his suggestion to wait until after the two attorneys meet.
"If worse comes to worst,
81.8%