Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 6 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
inhardt Lynch should decide to sell out. (I understand the Inn has been on the market in the recent past, although not at present.)
The Inn, as it now stands, has been and is, a very attractive and well-bred addition to our town. And we, also, are proud of its renown and the international honors it has so justly earned.
But this is our town! — we claim the right to preserve this beautiful and peaceful village as it now exists! The oppressive expansion planned will destroy for all time the very charm and ambiance that certainly attracted the Inn owners in the first place.
If the Inn must be expanded to such overwhelming size, the owners should relocate to a site where such expansion can be tolerated (increased traffic, increased taxes for road upkeep, water availability, tennis courts, swimming pools, and parking lots, helicopter landing sites — what have I missed?) without the esthetic and financial destruction of Little Washington. Larger buildings than the Little Inn have been successfully hiked up and towed to new locations — it is not impossible. Both the Inn and the town would benefit by this move.
Keep Little Washington the jewel it now is!
*jPONNAH. PARSON
Washington
92.1%