Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 1 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
(Continued from Page 1) her intention with sufficient clarity for it to be implemented by the court, according to J. Sloan Kuykendahl, attorney for Mrs. Wood’s heirs-at-law.
Her will specified “the" state organization or foundation engaged in heart research as beneficiary, not “a” or “an” organization, he noted, concluding that Mrs. Wood had a specific organization in mind.
It couldn’t have been the American Heart Association’s Virginia affiliate. he said, because that organization wasn't in existence when the will was written.
The ambiguous language of the bequest makes it impossible to determine if Virginia Wood meant the Heart Association, MCV or UVa, he said.
Kuykendahl argued further that the presumption in favor of a charitable bequest doesn't necessarily apply since Mrs. Wood’s will doesn’t specifically state that the money must be used for heart research. According to Kuykendahl, if UVa receives the bequest, there’s nothing to prevent the University from using the funds to supports its "big basketball team (or) their football team which hasn't been very
87.6%