Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 3 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
the vehicle and a $1,000 fine? That’s what they do in the [Shenandoah National] Park,” Supervisor Mike Massie noted, only to be advised that the county may not enact penalties more stringent than the state’s. Once Mr. McCarthy reports back on the state’s penalty limits, the ordinance will be readvertised and readopted.
As “working papers,” legal opinion remains confidential
During the reading of the accounts, Supervisor Massie commented on a $450 payment to attorney Frank Reynolds. Mr. McCarthy explained that the bill is for a legal opinion involving Rappahannock’s Agricultural and Forestal District regulations and that portions may be used if the county is later involved in a lawsuit. He reminded the supervisors that excerpts from Mr. Reynolds’ opinion were delivered to them individually before the board meeting convened.
Mr. McCarthy denied the Rappahannock News’ request for a copy of those excerpts, holding that the documents were working papers and thus exempt from disclosure under Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act. He did confirm, however, that the opinion relates to an attempt to subdivide a parcel under the guise of a boundary adjustment from the Windrush property on Jericho Road (Rt. 637) and that he has refused to approve the subdivision.
93.0%