Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 2 of 4 · from the scan, no model involved
By Mo:
f • Rappahannock Netfg Staff Writer .
or the second session in a tow, the Washington Tbwn
debate of the
i’s upcoming wastewater treatment plant, which as currently planned will pipe treated wastewater into the> .Rush River. The plan has been, the focus of controversy because the Rush extends a great distance beyond the borders of the IbwnofWashington, and touch opposition to the . Jb&rt; hascome from neighbors of-the river who r«eo«t8*cie of Washington.
The Department of Environmental Quality will hold a public hearing on the.town’s request far a 60,000 gallon draft permit for the new plant on March 28, and represen-, tatives of the rtoently created Friends of the Rush River were present and vocal jot i plans at the March meeting. , ^
^gCThis Council leaves the -impreisipni gg ^isr alternative; . .you need to go back to your
its,” said Monira Rifaat, a member of the steering comtteer
of Friends of the Rpfc River, The group was-'' formed in response to the town Council's sewage disposal plans, and contends that the Washington town council has not Adequately researched the town's wastewater problems ag other methods of disposal.
“YoteC last survey of failing septieeftstems was i
MUDDY fpf$RS: The Rush River flows close to VVashingUwlfpbsstrtg beneath U.§. 211 and flowing" right through the Rappahanriock County Park.
Rappahannock News Staff Photo/Anita p
55.5%