Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 5 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

School already has started in

some places around the country, and the rest of nation's students will be taking their seats within the next few days.

But getting ready for school-for both teachers and kids-has changed dramatically during the past generation, and not for the better.

Kids and parents used to be responsible for getting the school wardrobe ready for the year—a new pair of oxfords to be worn every day and dutifully changed to old shoes upon returning home, new wash pants and shirts for boys and several dresses for girls. School supplies meant a writing tablet, a couple of yellow No. 2 pencils and a box of 16 sharp new crayons.

These days, the ante has been severely upped. In most school districts, families get a list of what they're expected to show up with at the school door on the first day of class, and that can include not only very specific requirements for mechanical pencils and dryerase markers but hygienic and janitorial supplies such as antibacterial cleaners, facial tissues and even toilet paper.

That shouldn’t be happening. Nor should teachers be forced to pay out of their own pockets for basic classroom instructional materials that help them get the educational point across to larger and larger classes that come in with more and more social deficits and require ever-more sophisticated teaching methods to succeed.

But that's the pass we've come to in this country. As reported in the New York Times a few days ago, a survey by the national Education Association, the largest teachers' union in the country, showed that in 1996, teachers paid an average of $408 during the school year to purchase materials for their classrooms.

Five years later, the figure had risen to $443 yearly. In a similar online survey done this year by the NEA, the 700 teachers who responded spent an average of $1,200 of their own money-that's a whopping $130 every month of the academic year directly out of their paycheck-to subsidize the education effort.

That's a bit like asking reporters to give up their mileage reimbursements and buy their own notebooks, expecting firefighters to chip in for the gas when the alarm bell rings or wanting retail

95.0%