Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 6 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
mt uuaiu ui ntiu a public hearing at its September meeting.
Finally, after five months during which the Board of Supervisors repeatedly refused to act on the proposed amendments, we were forced to file another lawsuit against the County whose object was to force the County to enforce the existing provisions of the Zoning Ordinance which do not allow the construction or operation of a campground either by right or by special use permit in a Residential Subdivision District.
The County’s response was to file a suit in which it asks the Court to rule on whether or not the existing provisions of the Zoning Ordinance are valid or not and which states that the Board of Supervisors "entertain doubts as to whether Article 6 of the Ordinance (Residential Subdivision District) is valid, operative and enforceable.”
If the Board has doubts as to whether or not the Ordinance is enforceable, why doesn’t it pass the Amendments unanimously approved by the Planning Commission, instead of wasting the taxpayers' money (not to mention our money) litigating this matter in Court?
It is interesting to note that this is the only case on record in the Commonwealth of
87.5%