Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 1 · column 2 of 4 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

ed solution; and the prospect of “undesired” town development resulting from the development of such a townwide treatment system.

Town Council member Alice Butler was unrelenting in her quest for an answer to the question about the extent of the existing problem, but committee members were unable to provide a definitive response. Mrs. Butler wanted to know how many properties have septic problems, and she questioned the need for a $1.5 million system to solve a problem that might be limited in scope. She also expressed her view that those landowners with septic problems may not have adequately pursued solutions on their own, and should do so before the town assumed responsibility.

Town Treasurer Elaine Viguerie challenged the committee’s findings, and expressed concern about the proposed system’s cost and the means of paying for it. She nbted that the town’s restricted sewer fund had only $250,000, and said that “that leaves a lot of money . . . everyone would have to pay $10,000 each.”

Committee members Charlie Tompkins and Ed Barton attempted to explain the results of the needs

See WASTE, Page A8

93.9%