Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 2 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
committee comprising local citizens who mast be notified end given the opportunity to < respond should stime person, corporation or even the state; strive to do something that maiy*b4ve an impact on the scenic quality of the river.
In addition, scenic river status
of <hm« or other impediments that may alter the flow of the river unless authorised bytheCeneral Assembly.
A .local voice. Another level of approval befate Allowing money in* tteestetoblunge another footing
nitethrritfr^
it’»'&$e wonder that concerted^ citizens , initiated scenic river statusJkr the Rappahannock, ft’a no -eiiiprise that two Rappahannock residents who own property bordering the headwaters, pne flatter# an environmentalist, ttron^ly support this concept- So do property owners along the UppSr RappaHannock in neighboring ctentiesi >'■ !'Sd,Wlbt'sthe hurry? r Sjptetertf?: need Rappahannock’s endorsement to move the otacept to the General Assembly. The Genersl Assembly convenes in January- Rappahannock won’t give the go-ahead nod now until Decembers..
The daisy could force sponsors to hasten the papOTtork to press forward by yesr^end; the betterwait-than-never decision could cause supporters to rush through tfts drafting of policy-a move that ter bust.property owners along tfce Rappahannock, the people that supervisors so diligently want to protect.
53.9%