Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 12 · column 4 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
up now.”
The case was heard in federal court because the falsified data involved compliance with the Clean Water Act of 1977. According to the Washington Post, Environmental Protection Agency officials have acknowledged that the facilities and the pollutants discharged were small, but contended the case was important as a deterrant to similar acts by others in the monitoring program.
The Information Bureau of the Water Control Board turned the case over to the Environmental Protection Agency in late 1981, and that agency investigated the matter until February 1983, according to an official with the Criminal Enforcement Agency of the EPA in Philadelphia, who asked to remain unidentified.
"The facts dictated what kind of charges we pressed,” the official said.
65.2%