Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 18 · column 3 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
As to potential liability, Dr. Gangel explained that parents would be required to sign a waiver, relieving the School Board of responsibility once the children left the school grounds for the religious education program. “However, that doesn’t preclude the possibility of a legal problem if something happened to a child” going to or from the “rolling chapel,” he cautioned.
“Could a child just raise a hand and say ‘I want to go’?” Mr. Oliver questioned.
Written parental permission would be required before a child would be allowed to participate, Dr. Gangel said. And information on the availability of this religious education would be disseminated through flyers sent home by the school, he added.
“I don’t see how you can allow students to leave school property,” said board member Bryant Lee. “How can you be sure where they’ve gone?” he said, adding that the school could not maintain communication with the “rolling chapel” without creating problems relative to the Constitutional provision fpr separation of church and state. “You wouldn’t have any way to ensure that they’ve all gotten there.”
Dr. Gangel concurred that the more communication the school has with the “rolling chapel,” the greater the chance of establishing grounds for charges of sponsorship of a particular religion.
““I don’t see how it can work,” Mr-'Lee maintained.
Asked by the chairman for his position, board member Paul Nichols affirmed his opposition. “I haven’t changed,” said the Wake
91.9%