Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 4 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Klil* V WlUUgll bliv TTUOI^/YTai^l Committee studied many alternatives, that only a few alternatives were seriously considered. Opponents at the hearing were also concerned about odors from the effluent, and possible health risks from the chemicals present in effluent not regulated by DEQ.
“The people of Little Washington should solve their own problem,” said Fletcher
The Friends of the Rush also challenged DEQ’s numbers as well as Washington.
According to DEQ, the permit is written to account for the worst possible scenario, which in the case of the Rush was defined by DEQ as a “zero flow situation”, or a nearly dry riverbed, meaning that Washington’s effluent would be almost undiluted. The permit would require that even in that extreme situation, the concentrations of pollutants in a given amount of Rush river water not
91.0%