Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.

Page 17 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved

The clipping this text was read from
The clipping this text was read from

VIRGINIA:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY RE: ESTATE OF HELEN M. KILBY, DECEASED

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

It appearing that a report of the accounts of Timothy Jackson Kilby, personal representative of the estate of Helen M. Kilby, deceased, and of the debt&jand demands against her estate has been filed in the Clerk's Office, and that six months have elapsed since the qualification, on motion of the personal representative,

IT IS ORDERED that the creditors of, and all others interested in, the estate do show cause, if any they can, on the 21st day of May, 1987 at 9:00 am., before this Court at the Rappahannock County Courthouse. Washington, Virginia, against the payment and delivery of the estate of Helen M. Kilby, deceased, to the distributees and/or legatees, with or without refunding bonds as the Court prescribes.

And it is further ORDERED that the foregoing portion of this Order be published once a week for two successive weeks in the Rappahannock News, a newspaper of general circulation in Rappahannock County. Virginia.

ENTER: This 30th day of April, 1987.

William Shore Robertson

JUDGE I ask for this: Douglas K. Baumgardner P.O.Box 2 Washington, Virginia 22747 (703)675-3617 Counsel for Estate of

Helen M. Kilby, Deceased

A Copy Teste:

Diane Bruce. Clerk

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

In the Clerk's Office of the

Circuit Court of the County of

Rappahannock on the

21st day of April, 1987..

ORDER OF PUBLICATION Robin Owens Day Patricia N. Day IN RE: Adoption of a child to be named Justin Taft Day, Plaintiff

against James Daniel Seal, Defendant

The object of this suit is to obtain an Order of Adoption of a child to be named Justin Taft Day by Robin Owens Day, such Order being sought without the Defendant's consent, he being the natural father of the child, it being the Petitioner's contention that consent is withheld contrary to the best interests of the child. This Order of Publication is executed pursuant to Virginia Code Section 63.1-225 C.(2).

85.0%