Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 18 · column 2 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
fulfills the requirement that the site pass all permit and license restrictions.
• According to the title search, there are no covenants or other restrictions which would prohibit the use of the site as a landfill.
• Based on Mr. Luke’s title search, the deed to the property is unencumbered, he said.
• The survey indicated that the actual acreage is within the variance allowed, so there will be no adjustment on the purchase price.
On the basis of the process so far, Mr. Luke said he could certify that all contingencies had been met or waived, and the supervisors could proceed to purchase the property.
Mr. Henry suggested that title insurance be purchased to protect against litigation involving either the title or the survey. The other board members concurred with his recommendation.
Mr. Miller also requested that a “metes and bounds” record be included with the survey. Mr. Luke explained that is not standard practice any more because of the danger of an error in transcription. However, the rest of the board agreed with Mr. Miller, and the metes and bounds will be recorded.
Mr. Luke reported the purchase price as a total of $180,427, with checks going to Martin and Walker, attorneys for seller ($179,475), Diane Bruce, Clerk, recording and grantor’s tax ($198), Peter Luke, title search ($414), and Frances Foster, Treasurer, prorated 1987 property tax ($339). Mr. Luke said that closing would probably take place “Tuesday or Wednesday.”
The board approved 4-1 the resolution authorizing the sale. Again, Mr. Henry voted against.
95.7%