Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 7 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
It the court can disregard other _ zoning restrictions, why not set [ back?” member Sid Gottlieb asked. Mr. Reynolds said if the apart< ment were made more of a “depenI dency” close to the main house and ! using the same well and septic sysI tern, it would “no longer be conve; nient” for the court to order the property divided. “Convenient is hardly a quantitaive term,” Mr. Gottlieb said. “What you’re convincing me is that ; the courts can do anything they want. You’re asking us to make deci, sions fine tuning this for a case that ! hasn’t come up yet. I’m not prepared | to do that.” John Amos, Ms Amos’s father, said he had “compassion for anyone I taking care of family. I wouldn’t con! sider putting a member of my family ; back in the woods. I think a family ■ member should live reasonably close ' to the family. If it were 75 feet away, I would have no objection.” Mr. Amos said he had once had \fin option to purchase the 10 acres that includes the Lees property. ! When he didn’t exercise his option, , “within three weeks it was divided ; into two lots. Now I see another sub; division.” Tony Cutro said his driveway is ! across from the Lees. He said their ! current house has a two-car garage, and they are proposing to build an
89.9%