Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 14 · column 4 of 10 · from the scan, no model involved
Mr. and Mrs. D. Salahi, t-a )asis Vinyard, at the In ersection of U. S. Route 522 ind State Secondary Route 35. (9) SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 134: Varies A. Green, t-a .omBarDy, has applied for a pecial use permit In acordance with Section 7-1(10) of the Rappahannock :ounty Zoning Ordinance, 973, to operate pinball and 'ideo machines at LomBarDy Restaurant on U. S. Route 211, ast of Amissville. (10) SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 185: telen Bently Crowell has ipplied for a special use lermit in accordance with lection 2-1-2(20) of the Raprahannock County Zoning Irdinance, 1973, to establish he main house of her rroperty as a girls dormitory or The Wakefield School in Mint Hill, Virginia on U. S. Route 522. The above named applicants ind any other interested >arties wishing to be heard ire requested to be present at he said time and place or to orward their written comnents on any of the foregoing ipplications to the Board of foning Appeals in care of the foning Office. Copies of all of he following applications are in file at the Zoning Office, vhich is open Tuesday and rhursday, 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 >.m., telephone 675-3342. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FOR RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY By: David L. Konick Zoning Administrator 202 021 28 ROTRi TO THE PUBLIC OF PROPOSED INCREASE M RATES AND CHARGES BY CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF VIRGINIA On September 1, 1982, Central Telephone Company of Virginia ("Center or "Company") filed an application for increased rates under the Commission's Financial Operating Review ("FOR") procedures Centel's application for increased rates was in two parts, or "phases." "Phase I" contained prescribed FOR data and adjustments supporting rates intended to generate $2,269,533 in additional annual revenues by means of a 5.77 percent surcharge applied to most current Centel tariff rates Centel proposed to place "Phase I” rates into effect, on an interim basis, subject to refund, 30 days after the September 1, 1982. filing date of the application. "Phase II" of the application contained additional data supporting rates which Centel proposed to place into effect on January 1, 1983 The proposed "Phase II" rates were intended to generate an additional $2,954,771 in annual
77.1%