Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 3 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
6. Definitely! I would interview candidates to determine that they have the interests of the children, of the county and people at heart, and not their own.
7. I would support a delay and would certainly push for a deferment.
8. I believe so. We are ready for a county administrator and that is their job— to administrate, not to govern the county. By having a qualified county administrator, he or she would probably save the county money enough through efficiency to justify their position and pay a portion of their salary.
It would also free the supervisors to do their job more effectively and take some burden off the Clerk of the Court.
There are wise, competent, retired people who could fill this position with salary to supplement their Social Security or pension.
9. At this time, yes.
10. Like the rest of you, I have an extreme hatred for taxes. I don’t mind county taxes as much as federal taxes. Most of our federal taxes pay for the inefficiency of government. However, we can use, see and reap great benefits from our county taxes. The people currently spending our tax money have been very efficient, I believe. All of the above items should be considered. as are others that haven’t been considered, and I think the people of the county should consider these options and others and be ready to discuss them with their elected representatives.
Let the citizens be presented with the budget and the revenues needed to be raised and decide at town meetings how they want to be taxed. Then the supervisors can use this to set the tax structures to insure everyone pays their fair share. I am not trying to avoid the issue. This is the approach I would try in my district.
11. The school budget, facilities and educational requirements will be major issues for years to come.
Zoning to accommodate those who cannot afford acreage plus a house, who work in the county and make a contribution to the county. Also those who work out of the county and cannot afford the time to attend to the needs of large acreage.
83.6%