Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 1 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
But, at the same time, were disappointed that in light of the information from experts which we provided and impact on a great number of residents that the supervisors didn’t see lit to rescind their resolution to condemn this property,” Reynolds said following the supervisors’ meeting.
The proposed landfill was on the Board’s meeting agenda and Reynolds was scheduled to address the supervisors. The courthouse neared capacity in anticipation of this.
Reynolds told supervisors that the proposed location on Route 621 should not become a landfill even if it could pass all State Health Department tests. Reynolds said there had been no public discussion of options, no public input and no study of the cost feasibility of the proposed location.
Reynolds listed several reasons why CCRC members believe the supervisors should drop the proposed landfill site, among them:
• Research, proper approach. Reynolds alluded to Culpeper County’s
79.2%