Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 5 · column 5 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
Front Royal.
In January 2008, the hearing will culminate with testimony from “formal case participants’ So far, they indude Dominion and its partner, Allegheny Foma; several affected counties’ Board of Supervisors, the Piedmont Environmental Council, the Power-line Landowners Alliance and a husband and wife, Richard B. and Julianne Clifford.
Participants may have lawyers representing their interests during the Richmond proceeding.
Participants also may eafi expert witnesses, who may be cross-examined.
“Public witnesses* who didn’t testify at the local hearing wiH be allowed tospeakat the beginning of the Richmond hearing.
The hearing examiner will set a deadline for partio- M pants to submit "dosing briefs” to the SCC.
Farmer said it would take - the examiner “several months* to complete report, which will include a : ' recommendation to the corporation's three-judge pend.
The examiner could ree* ammend approval or denial at > the proposed or alternative corridor. Or, he could suggest a new corridor option.
Dominion’s proposed corridor adjoins an existing <■»* that passes through Frederick, Warren, Fauquier, Rappahannock, Culpeper; Prince William and Loudoun counties.
Its alternative route, . largely paralleling Interstate 66, cuts through Frederick, Warren, Fauquier; Prince William and Loudoun counties.
The proposed and alternative corridors would link substations near Winchester and at Areola in Loudoun County
The three SCC judges wiH issue a “final order* on the Dominion proposaL
That decision may be appealed to the Virginia Supreme Court, but only by formal case participants.
E-mail the reporter'll dddrosscGtimespapenaorkZ
58.7%