Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 3 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Ur. Krebsers quote ot senator Sam Ervin makes Mr. Viguerie’s point—not his. The American people have, at least, a remnant of sound religious instinct, but does anyone think seriously that there is any threat of any of our traditional forms of religion taking control of the American government? But to the extent that the Supreme Court interferes with that faith and morality, common among the American people in the past, religious freedom is perishing. If the Supreme Court ever gets back to interpreting the Constitution according the clearly manifest and well documented mind and intent of the framers of the Constitution, the “new right” will have accomplished its purpose and will go out of business as such.
I have replied in the past, in Letters to the Editor, to the thoughts of Dr. Krebser on the subject of abortion. I found them confused. His recent letter I find still confused, but also interesting.
The expression “pro-choice” is recent and significant for it is a euphemism for “pro-abortion.” Why is it
95.0%