Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 16 · column 5 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Continued from Page 1
he sees “no problems whatsoever” with the county answering the areas of concern addressed by Mr. Wright.
The board’s administrative assistant said that the floodplains are all marked on the maps which were submitted to the state along with the design plans. To the question of the “shallow aquifers,” he said, “We will respond to the concerns.”
Mr. McCarthy added that the design plans will be modified so that the leachate containment will be addressed “from day one,” rather than delayed until a later date. He said that the county will talk to the Department of Waste Management to “make sure that they understand what we plan to do” with the holding tank proposed in the plans.
He explained that the tank would serve as a monitoring point as the first leachate begins to collect. For the first several months, he added, there will be nothing but clear water being collected, since it will take some time before the waste disposed in the trench begins to decompose and mingle with the leaching water.
Mr. Wright also informed Mr. McCarthy that he had, as he promised, conducted an on-site inspection after the meeting March 11. Another complaint raised at the meeting was that preliminary clearing of stumps and trees had been poorly done, creating an eyesore which is “a disgrace,” according to Bobby Carter.
Mr. Wright reported that “it apr
94.5%