Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 1 of 6 · from the scan, no model involved
I live on an unpaved secondary
road. There are two landowners beyond me on this road before it dead ends. In order to pave an existing unpaved secondary road Virginia Code requires that road to carry a minimum of 50 vehicles per day. It is unreasonable to expect that number to be mqtfor most of the road I live on7*,«Sw
Why does local rezoning policy require easement dedication on transferred property to accommodate VDOTs desired 50 foot easement even in this case? (For possible future paving under their current “desired” not required profile?) What is substandard about the original 30 foot prescriptive easement when the dead end roadway serves even 15 or 20 landowners. Do our elected county officials feel, for some reason, beholden to VDOT or to the Commonwealth Transportation Board? The policy is not in the interest of me or my neighbors. Who does the board represent? Or doesn’t it make any difference as long as you (or I) the iandowner(s) continue to pay taxes on land we can’t use?
89.5%