Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
sas, we were mostly told about how these protestors were violating a federal judge’s injunction and were somehow acting in a lawless and irresponsible way.
Some additional facts help flesh out the whole story. The U.S. Department of Justice has gone into court against the judge, not against the protestors, claiming that the judge has acted in a lawless fashion by issuing an injunction when he had no power over the subject matter (the protest) or over the person (the individual protestors who were arrested).
The judge involved, U.S. District Court Judge Patrick Kelly, is also accused of acting out of personal bias rather than objective reason: the judge appointed the personal attorney of the abortionist to act as special prosecutor after the U.S. Attorney would not prosecute the judge’s faulty contempt arrests; the president of the leading pro-abortion group, the National Organization for Women, is Judge Kelly’s first cousin; Judge Kelly has (contrary to judicial canons) appeared on national television as an advocate and spokesperson for the abortionists; persons acting lawfully near the protest site were arrested under Judge Kelly’s contempt order merely because they were wearing Pro-life or anti-abortion T-shirts; Judge Kelly is alleged to have threatened to bankrupt churches and shut them down be
91.1%