Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 2 · column 4 of 7 · from the scan, no model involved
Coalition of rural counties. The Board reviewed a letter from Patrick County (pop. 15,282) asking Rappahannock to join other rural counties concerned about distribution of therstxte's highway hinds.
“Rural counties in a lot of cases get the short end of the stick,” Chairman Latham said. Supervisor Estes said the competition with cities for funds could get worse, alluding to a city in Prince William county that voted to contribute fluids to a highway project, fluids that come from taxpayer dollars. Supervisor Estes said decisions such ss this in urban areas made it difficult far the state not to allocate the fluids requested. , — ..
The supervisors decided the Patrick County letter was worth further consideration. The Board will respond in support of the organizational efforts and ask for more information.
Correction
F« Hunting Limited
A section of a report on hunting in last week’s edition was incorrect. Fox hunting in Rappahannock County is hmited to hunting with
60.4%