Block · one region of the page, as the scanner read it. It may hold a whole story, part of one, several, or an advertisement; stitching blocks into articles is the next step. Text is supplied OCR.
Page 4 · column 6 of 9 · from the scan, no model involved
tioned, although the board’s reaction indicated that the money called for by the Moseley-Henning plan outstripped the amount budgeted.
In actuality, just the estimate on a detached school boad office alone—without well, pump, storage tank and septic system—exceeded the 1982-83 appropriation for the entire building. With a separate vehicle maintenance facility added, the price tag soared to $273,595. The $177,220 for the bus shop again did not include utilities or gravel for the bus parking lot, paving and fencing for the bus parking area.
For a combined building with offices and bus shop in the same structure, the cost estimate was a staggering $301,700, excluding the same items as the separate buildings. The figure climbed to a total of $341,863, when site works, utilities, furnishings and equipment, landscaping, surveys, soil investigation and other items were added.
Moseley-Henning’s revised program and cost analysis submitted the following week for a combined bus shop and office reduced the square footage, eliminated a vehicle lift and added items (such as firewalls, showers for the bus shop and toilets with handicapped access) to conform to the state building code. The total cost,$239,611, remained way over the budgeted amount and still didn’t include utilities, gravel and fencing for bus parking area and paving.
93.8%